A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology

Shibaditya Chakraborty; Arunima Chaudhuri; Anjan Mukherjee; Debasis Adhya

doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

2023, Vol: 13, Issue: 3

13/3Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration

« Previous Article

Original Research

Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022; 12(11): 1880-1886

doi: 10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology

Shibaditya Chakraborty, Arunima Chaudhuri, Anjan Mukherjee, Debasis Adhya.

Abstract
Background: To become lifelong learners, it is essential for medical students to develop self-directed learning (SDL) skills from early medical schools.

Aim and Objective: The present study was conducted to compare the outcome of traditional lecture classes (LCs) and SDL sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology.

Materials and Methods: This pilot study was conducted over a period of 1 year in the department of physiology among the first MBBS students to compare the outcome of traditional LCs with SDL sessions. The first 12 traditional LCs were conducted among Group A (roll no. 1–100) and the first 12 SDL sessions were conducted among Group B (roll no. 101–200). For the rest 13 traditional LCs and SDL sessions, crossover of two groups was done, that is, traditional LCs were conducted among Group B and SDL sessions were conducted among Group A.

Results: Students performed significantly better in the 3rd, 7th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 15th, 18th, 19th, 21st, and 22nd SDL sessions as compared to LCs in post-test sessions. Students performed significantly better in the 4th, 6th, 8th, 16th, 23rd, 24th, and 25th LCs as compared to SDL sessions in posttests. Students performed significantly better in post-test sessions as compared to pre-test sessions. Students were highly satisfied with the program (as per evaluation done by Kirkpatrick model: Level 1).

Conclusions: The students were highly satisfied with the teaching-learning program implemented by the department of physiology and their performance was better following SDL sessions as compared to traditional LCs.

Key words: Self-directed Learning; Medical Students; Competency-based Medical Education

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Shibaditya Chakraborty Articles by Arunima Chaudhuri Articles by Anjan Mukherjee Articles by Debasis Adhya
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee A, Adhya D. A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022; 12(11): 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Web Style

Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee A, Adhya D. A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=99917 [Access: March 02, 2023]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee A, Adhya D. A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022; 12(11): 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee A, Adhya D. A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2022), [cited March 02, 2023]; 12(11): 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Harvard Style

Chakraborty, S., Chaudhuri, . A., Mukherjee, . A. & Adhya, . D. (2022) A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 12 (11), 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Turabian Style

Chakraborty, Shibaditya, Arunima Chaudhuri, Anjan Mukherjee, and Debasis Adhya. 2022. A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 12 (11), 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Chicago Style

Chakraborty, Shibaditya, Arunima Chaudhuri, Anjan Mukherjee, and Debasis Adhya. "A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 12 (2022), 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Chakraborty, Shibaditya, Arunima Chaudhuri, Anjan Mukherjee, and Debasis Adhya. "A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 12.11 (2022), 1880-1886. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Chakraborty, S., Chaudhuri, . A., Mukherjee, . A. & Adhya, . D. (2022) A study to evaluate the outcomes of traditional lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among the first MBBS students in the department of physiology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 12 (11), 1880-1886. doi:10.5455/njppp.2022.12.03114202214032022

Author Login Reviewer Login About Publisher Editorial Policies Peer Review Policy Editorial & Peer Review Process Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Conflict of Interest Policy Plagiarism Policy Protection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of Concern Self-Archiving Policies Statement of Informed Consent Advertising Policy Terms of Use License Information Copyright Information



Copyright © 2023 National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information Publisher publishernjppp@gmail.com Editorial query editornjppp1@gmail.com MOB - 8780040272

Contact Information

How to cite this article