E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is printed and electronic peer-reviewed international journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. In order to provide our readers with a journal of highest quality we state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement. All articles not in accordance with these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is discovered at any time even after the publication. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is checking all papers in a single-blind peer review process; Submitted manuscripts for publication are single-blind peer-reviewed: reviewers are aware of the identity of the authors, but author(s) are unaware of the identity of the reviewers.

We also check for plagiarism and research fabrication (using iThenticate) as National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology reserves the right to use plagiarism detecting software to screen submitted papers at all times; falsification (manipulation of existing research data, tables, or images) and improper use of animals in research. In accordance with the code of conduct we will report any cases of suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing.


The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher.

National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is committed to the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all measures against any publication malpractices.


All parties involved in publishing - the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers and the publisher - agree with standards of ethical behavior.


Author Responsibilities:

Authors must ensure that they have written original works. In addition, they must ensure that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources should be appropriately credited and referenced. Authors are also responsible for submitting articles in English. Authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles confirm that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works without clearly citing. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources (including online sites) should be appropriately credited and referenced. All authors should disclose financial or other conflict of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript (financial support for the project should be disclosed). When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. An author agrees to the license agreement before submitting the article. All articles must be submitted using online submission procedure or by sending your article as an email attachment. Submitting a paper simultaneously to more than one publication at a time is a breach of publications ethics.


Editors Responsibilities:

Editors must ensure a fair single-blind peer-review of the submitted articles for publication. They will strive to prevent any potential conflict of interests between the author and editorial and review personnel. Editors will also ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing. Editor-in-Chief will coordinate the work of the editors.


Reviewers Responsibilities:

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on their contents. They must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential. They must evaluate the submitted works objectively as well as present clearly their opinions on the works in a clear way in the review form. Reviewers must bring to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief any information that may be reason to reject publication of a manuscript. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor-in-Chief and excuse him/her-self from the review process.

Ethical Guidelines for Editors

Scope of Application

These ethical guidelines are universally applicable to all members of the Editorial Board, including the Editor-in-Chief, and Editorial Board Members. Upholding these ethical standards is vital for fostering a scholarly publishing environment that is both trustworthy and reputable.

General Ethical Principles

Integrity and Objectivity

Impartiality: Editorial Board Members must ensure impartiality and objectivity in their editorial decisions, free from personal, financial, or any other conflicts of interest.

Confidentiality: All submitted manuscripts and editorial discussions must be treated as confidential, with Editorial Board Members refraining from disclosing information to anyone outside the editorial process.

Professional Conduct

Professionalism: The highest level of professionalism is expected, encompassing respectful treatment of authors, reviewers, and colleagues, while avoiding any form of harassment, discrimination, or unprofessional behavior.

Disclosure of Conflicts: Members of the Editorial Board must promptly disclose any potential conflicts of interest, fostering transparency in the editorial process.

Manuscript Handling

Peer Review

Fair and Constructive Review: Editorial Board Members are entrusted with conducting fair, unbiased, and constructive peer reviews, focusing on the quality and validity of the research and providing authors with guidance for improvement.

Timeliness: Completing the peer review process in a timely manner is essential, contributing to the efficiency of the editorial process and ensuring authors receive feedback promptly.

Authorship and Contributorship

Authorship Criteria: Adherence to recognized authorship criteria is crucial, ensuring that individuals who have significantly contributed to the research are appropriately listed as authors.

Conflict Resolution: In cases of authorship disputes or conflicts, Editorial Board Members are responsible for actively working towards fair and amicable resolutions, involving relevant parties and seeking guidance when necessary.

Ethical Oversight

Research Ethics

Human and Animal Subjects: Editorial Board Members must ensure that research involving human or animal subjects adheres to ethical standards, with authors providing evidence of ethical approval.

Plagiarism and Misconduct: Vigilance in identifying and addressing plagiarism, data fabrication, and other forms of research misconduct is crucial. Allegations of misconduct should be reported for thorough investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

Disclosure and Management: Editorial Board Members should disclose conflicts of interest related to submitted manuscripts and recuse themselves when necessary, with disclosure made to the Editor-in-Chief for alternative reviewer assignment.

Reviewer-Editorial Board Member Conflicts: If an Editorial Board Member is assigned as a reviewer, disclosure of any conflict of interest to the Editor-in-Chief is mandatory, leading to the assignment of an alternative reviewer.

Editorial Decision-Making

Fairness and Transparency

Consistency: Editorial decisions should be consistent, fair, and based solely on the merit of the research, without bias.

Communication: Editorial Board Members are obligated to communicate decisions clearly, providing authors with constructive feedback, and outlining any significant concerns or recommended revisions.

Appeals and Complaints

Grievance Handling: Editorial Board Members play a crucial role in the fair and impartial resolution of author or reviewer grievances, with any appeals or complaints brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief.

Confidentiality: The confidentiality of all information related to appeals or complaints is paramount to protect the privacy and integrity of the parties involved.

Continuous Professional Development

Stay Informed

Emerging Standards: Editorial Board Members are encouraged to stay informed about emerging ethical standards, guidelines, and best practices in scholarly publishing to remain effective contributors.

Training Opportunities: NJPPP may provide training opportunities or resources to support Editorial Board Members in staying abreast of evolving ethical standards, and their participation is actively encouraged for continuous professional development.

Continuous Improvement

Recognizing the dynamic nature of scholarly publishing, NJPPP is committed to regularly reviewing and updating these Ethical Guidelines to align with evolving standards and best practices. The commitment to continuous improvement underscores NJPPP’s dedication to maintaining its position as a reputable and ethical journal.

Commitment to Ethical Excellence

Adherence to these Ethical Guidelines is paramount for maintaining the reputation, credibility, and ethical standing of the National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology (NJPPP). Editorial Board Members play a pivotal role in upholding these principles, actively contributing to the integrity of the scholarly publishing process and fostering a culture of ethical excellence.