Editorial Policies

The editorial policies of the National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology (NJPPP) are meticulously crafted to uphold the highest standards of scholarly publishing, fostering a dynamic and inclusive environment for the dissemination of cutting-edge research in the fields of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. This comprehensive overview delves into the core principles that guide our editorial decision-making, ethical considerations, peer review processes, and commitment to transparency.

1. Editorial Decision-Making

1.1. Editorial Independence

NJPPP is committed to maintaining editorial independence, ensuring that decisions regarding manuscript acceptance, rejection, or revision are based solely on academic merit. Editorial autonomy is upheld to preserve the integrity of the peer review process and editorial judgments.

1.2. Fair and Unbiased Evaluation

All submissions undergo a fair, unbiased, and rigorous evaluation process. Our editors strive to consider the scientific quality, originality, and significance of each manuscript, regardless of authors' affiliations, backgrounds, or other non-scientific factors.

2. Peer Review Process

2.1. Rigorous Peer Review

NJPPP adheres to a rigorous peer review process, employing experts in the respective fields of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology to evaluate manuscript submissions. This process ensures that published articles meet high scientific standards and contribute valuable insights to the scholarly community.

2.2. Single-Blind Peer Review Policy

NJPPP adheres to the single-blind peer review. In this model, the reviewers are aware of the identities of the authors, providing transparency in the review process. However, authors are not informed of the identities of the reviewers, preserving the confidentiality of the peer review process.

2.3. Timely Review Process

Efficiency is paramount in our peer review process. NJPPP is dedicated to providing authors with timely and constructive feedback, minimizing the duration between submission and final editorial decisions. This commitment is aligned with our goal to support researchers in the timely dissemination of their findings.

3. Ethical Considerations

3.1. Research Integrity

Authors are expected to uphold the highest standards of research integrity. NJPPP follows established ethical guidelines and encourages the responsible conduct of research, including proper citation of sources, avoidance of plagiarism, and accurate reporting of methodologies and results.

3.2. Authorship and Contributorship

Authorship should be based on substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. NJPPP emphasizes the importance of transparent authorship and contributorship, requiring all listed authors to have made significant intellectual contributions to the work.

3.3. Conflict of Interest

NJPPP is committed to transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest. Authors are required to disclose any financial or personal relationships that may influence the interpretation of their research findings. Editors and reviewers are also expected to declare any conflicts of interest that may compromise impartial decision-making.

3.4. Plagiarism Detection

NJPPP employs advanced plagiarism detection tools to ensure the originality of submitted manuscripts. Authors are responsible for submitting work that is free from plagiarism, and any instances of misconduct are treated with the utmost seriousness.

4. Author Guidelines

4.1. Manuscript Preparation

Authors submitting to NJPPP are provided with clear and comprehensive guidelines for manuscript preparation. These guidelines cover formatting, referencing, and other essential elements to facilitate a standardized and streamlined publication process.

4.2. Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

Authors conducting research involving human subjects or animals must provide evidence of ethical approval and informed consent in their submissions. This commitment to ethical research practices underscores NJPPP's dedication to the welfare of research participants.

5. Transparency and Open Science

5.1. Data Sharing and Reproducibility

NJPPP encourages authors to share data, code, and other relevant materials to promote transparency and reproducibility. Open science practices contribute to the robustness and credibility of scientific research, aligning with our commitment to advancing knowledge.

5.2. Post-Publication Discussions

NJPPP supports post-publication discussions and welcomes constructive criticism as a means of promoting scientific discourse. Authors, readers, and the wider scholarly community are encouraged to engage in discussions that contribute to the refinement and advancement of published research.

6. Continuous Improvement

6.1. Editorial Board Evaluation

The NJPPP Editorial Board regularly evaluates and refines editorial policies to adapt to evolving standards and best practices in scholarly publishing. Feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers is actively sought to inform continuous improvement initiatives.

6.2. Collaborative Initiatives

NJPPP collaborates with other journals, institutions, and organizations to foster innovation and uphold the highest standards in scholarly publishing. Joint initiatives contribute to the advancement of editorial practices and support a global community of researchers.