E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research


Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations

Nileshwari Vala, Krup Koradia, Madhuri Vachhani.


Abstract
Background:
PowerPoint presentation is a novel method of teaching used widely now a days. Still popularity of traditional chalk and board method remains the same among many teachers and students. Many researchers have noted that PowerPoint presentations often function as a one-way communication tool, which can quickly bore students. While chalk and board method was found more interactive and live.

Aim:
This study was designed to know the perceptions and preferences of the students for Chalk & board vs PowerPoint presentation method.

Methods:
This is an institution based cross-sectional study. Total 224 students participated in the study. They were taught same topic by same teacher for same duration of time on two different sessions conducted on different days. After completion of the sessions a questionnaire was given to the students. Score was calculated to compare both the methods.

Results:
Mean score of Chalk and board method was 37.4 ± 11.6 while mean score for PowerPoint method was 29 ± 11.3. This difference was statistically significant. 58.9% students preferred chalk and board method overall compared to 41.1% students preferred PowerPoint presentations.

Conclusion:
Chalk and board method is more preferred as compared to PowerPoint presentation.

Key words: Chalk board vs PowerPoint, Teaching methods, students’ preference, under graduate medical education


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Nileshwari Vala
Articles by Krup Koradia
Articles by Madhuri Vachhani
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Vala N, Koradia K, Vachhani M. Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(11): 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20


Web Style

Vala N, Koradia K, Vachhani M. Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=210425 [Access: January 17, 2025]. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Vala N, Koradia K, Vachhani M. Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(11): 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Vala N, Koradia K, Vachhani M. Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024), [cited January 17, 2025]; 14(11): 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



Harvard Style

Vala, N., Koradia, . K. & Vachhani, . M. (2024) Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 14 (11), 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



Turabian Style

Vala, Nileshwari, Krup Koradia, and Madhuri Vachhani. 2024. Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (11), 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



Chicago Style

Vala, Nileshwari, Krup Koradia, and Madhuri Vachhani. "Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14 (2024), 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Vala, Nileshwari, Krup Koradia, and Madhuri Vachhani. "Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14.11 (2024), 2459-2462. Print. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Vala, N., Koradia, . K. & Vachhani, . M. (2024) Analyzing students’ choices: Blackboard teaching vs. PowerPoint presentations. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (11), 2459-2462. doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2024.v14.i11.20