E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 02 Nov 2026
 


Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline

Niveditha Venugopal Shatheeash, Anu Sengottaiyan, Kavitha Meikandan, Vijay Anto James.


Abstract
Background:
Age-related brain changes can lead to mild cognitive decline, particularly involving the temporal and prefrontal cortices, which may impair hearing and speech discrimination. Parkinson’s disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder, accelerates cognitive deterioration compared to normal ageing.

Aim:
This study aimed to evaluate visual and cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) as objective indicators of cognitive decline in PD by measuring P100 and P300 latencies and comparing them with age-matched controls.

Methods:
An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 participants, comprising 25 individuals diagnosed with PD (Group A) and 25 age-matched healthy controls (Group B). Visual evoked potentials (VEP) and cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded using a standard evoked potential analyzer. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, independent t-tests, ANCOVA, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:
Compared to controls, participants with PD demonstrated significantly prolonged P100 latencies on both the right (p = 0.014) and left (p = 0.003) sides, and increased P300 latency (p = 0.005). No significant differences were observed in the amplitudes of P100 and P300 between groups. MoCA scores in the PD group (mean 22.72 ± 3.13) showed a negative correlation with P300 latency, indicating that greater cognitive impairment was associated with delayed cortical responses.

Conclusion:
Prolonged VEP and CAEP latencies were observed in patients with PD compared with age-matched controls, with P300 latency showing an association with cognitive performance. These findings suggest that evoked potential latencies may indicate alterations in sensory and cognitive processing in PD. However, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw conclusions about the utility of these electrophysiological measures for early detection, prediction of cognitive decline, or improvement of clinical outcomes. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to
establish their potential clinical significance.

Key words: Central Nervous System function; Electrophysiology; Event-related brain responses; Neurodegeneration; Sensory processing.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Niveditha Venugopal Shatheeash
Articles by Anu Sengottaiyan
Articles by Kavitha Meikandan
Articles by Vijay Anto James
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Shatheeash NV, Sengottaiyan A, Meikandan K, James VA. Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2026; 16(2): 133-141.

doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



Web Style

Shatheeash NV, Sengottaiyan A, Meikandan K, James VA. Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=330466 [Access: November 05, 2026].

doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Shatheeash NV, Sengottaiyan A, Meikandan K, James VA. Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2026; 16(2): 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Shatheeash NV, Sengottaiyan A, Meikandan K, James VA. Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2026), [cited November 05, 2026]; 16(2): 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



Harvard Style

Shatheeash, N. V., Sengottaiyan, . A., Meikandan, . K. & James, . V. A. (2026) Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 16 (2), 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



Turabian Style

Shatheeash, Niveditha Venugopal, Anu Sengottaiyan, Kavitha Meikandan, and Vijay Anto James. 2026. Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 16 (2), 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



Chicago Style

Shatheeash, Niveditha Venugopal, Anu Sengottaiyan, Kavitha Meikandan, and Vijay Anto James. "Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 16 (2026), 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Shatheeash, Niveditha Venugopal, Anu Sengottaiyan, Kavitha Meikandan, and Vijay Anto James. "Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 16.2 (2026), 133-141. Print.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Shatheeash, N. V., Sengottaiyan, . A., Meikandan, . K. & James, . V. A. (2026) Comparative study of visual evoked potential and cortical auditory evoked potential in Parkinson’s disease patients and age-matched controls to assess cognitive decline. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 16 (2), 133-141.


doi:10.5455/NJPPP.2026.v16.i2.10