E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 12 Aug 2024
 


Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries

Nimeeliya Zabrin, Prathibha V K, Ranju Jayaprakash, Gopakumar G, Shyjar Babu J, Nishad Nazimudeen.


Abstract
Background: Local anesthetics are commonly used in interfascial plane blocks these days. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) have emerged as an indispensable part of multimodal analgesia for post-operative pain management in abdominal procedures. Ultrasound (US)-guided QLB is a good option to be considered in multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgeries.

Aims and Objectives: Our aim was to compare the efficacy of TAPB and QLB in mitigating post-operative pain. The study’s objectives were to evaluate the extent of use of other analgesics in the post-operative period between TAPB and QLB and to compare the duration of action of TAPB and QLB.

Materials and Methods: Sixty patients aged 18–75 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statuses 1–2 were selected and divided randomly into two groups of 30 each, Group Q and Group T who were administered QLB and TAPB, respectively. Before starting this randomized, double-blinded study, ethics committee sanction, and detailed informed written consent were obtained. US-guided QLB and TAPB were performed on either side in patients planned for lower abdominal procedures under sub-arachnoid block and 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was used. Both groups were compared for hemodynamic parameters. Post-operative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and compared between the two groups. The time to initial rescue analgesic requested and the total amount of rescue analgesic requested were compared between the two groups.

Results: Demographic data of Group Q and Group T were similar. The VAS score was much less in Group Q in comparison with Group T at 12, 24, and 48 h. The time at which the first analgesic demanded was much earlier in Group T compared with Group Q (mean: 40.2 vs. 30.57, P = 0.004). Patients in Group T demanded analgesics much more than patients in Group Q.

Conclusion: The posterior QLB represents a much more efficient regional block as part of multi-modal analgesia in comparison to the posterior TAPB in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. We require more studies to decide the ideal dose and the volume of the drug to be administered.

Key words: Quadratus Lumborum Block; Transversus Abdominis Plane Block; Pain; Lower Abdominal Surgeries


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Nimeeliya Zabrin
Articles by Prathibha V K
Articles by Ranju Jayaprakash
Articles by Gopakumar G
Articles by Shyjar Babu J
Articles by Nishad Nazimudeen
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Zabrin N, K PV, Jayaprakash R, G G, J SB, Nazimudeen N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(10): 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024


Web Style

Zabrin N, K PV, Jayaprakash R, G G, J SB, Nazimudeen N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=210494 [Access: October 03, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Zabrin N, K PV, Jayaprakash R, G G, J SB, Nazimudeen N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(10): 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Zabrin N, K PV, Jayaprakash R, G G, J SB, Nazimudeen N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024), [cited October 03, 2024]; 14(10): 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



Harvard Style

Zabrin, N., K, . P. V., Jayaprakash, . R., G, . G., J, . S. B. & Nazimudeen, . N. (2024) Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 14 (10), 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



Turabian Style

Zabrin, Nimeeliya, Prathibha V K, Ranju Jayaprakash, Gopakumar G, Shyjar Babu J, and Nishad Nazimudeen. 2024. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (10), 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



Chicago Style

Zabrin, Nimeeliya, Prathibha V K, Ranju Jayaprakash, Gopakumar G, Shyjar Babu J, and Nishad Nazimudeen. "Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14 (2024), 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Zabrin, Nimeeliya, Prathibha V K, Ranju Jayaprakash, Gopakumar G, Shyjar Babu J, and Nishad Nazimudeen. "Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14.10 (2024), 2285-2289. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Zabrin, N., K, . P. V., Jayaprakash, . R., G, . G., J, . S. B. & Nazimudeen, . N. (2024) Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (10), 2285-2289. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.13.07297202404082024





Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Assessment of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women Attending the City Tebessa PMI (Algeria) [English]
    Taleb Salima, Kaibi Mounira, Deghboudj Nadjia
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 97-105
    » Abstract

  • Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population
    ShobhaRani Vedala, Niranjan Paul, Abhay B Mane
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 3(2): 118-123
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2013.3.109-114

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • Evaluation of potential drug-drug interaction in indoor patients of pediatric department of tertiary care hospital
    Simran Patel, Mayur Chaudhari, Nrupal Patel
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(10): 1012-1016
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0725209072019

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Analyzing Pharmaceutical Industry [English]
    Veselin Tima Dickov, Dragan Mitrovic, Boris Milan Kuzman
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 1-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2011.1.1-8

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles