E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 29 Jun 2024
 


Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia

Devanand J, Abunaya H I, Jiya Michael, Sheen Tarsis.


Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used regional anesthesia techniques. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known iatrogenic consequence of spinal anesthetic and diagnostic lumbar puncture, primarily caused by loss of cerebral spinal fluid. To reduce complications, spinal needles have undergone modifications. The two most important modifiable risk variables for PDPH were needle shape and size. In young expecting mothers, post-cesarean sections are associated with an increased incidence of PDPH.

Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the incidence of PDPH in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needles following spinal anesthesia.

Materials and Methods: This 1-year double-blind study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia from August 2021 to July 2022. The study comprised obstetric patients who were scheduled for elective-segment cesarean section. The subarachnoid block needle was divided into Groups A and B at random: Group A 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle with a pencil point, whereas Group B 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle with a cutting bevel. Records were kept on age, height, weight, and gestational age. A follow-up was conducted up until the discharge date. The incidence and severity of PDPH after spinal anesthesia were examined in both groups. The results were analyzed with SPSS 20.0, and the Fischer exact and Chi-square tests were used to look for statistical significance.

Results: The current study included 120 patients in total, 60 patients in each of Groups A and B. When a pencil point Whitacre was used, the incidence of PDPH was 2 (3.3%), however, when a cutting Quincke needle was used, the incidence was 7 (10.8%). With a P < 0.05, the relationship between the two was considered statistically significant. The pain severity was mild in both patients of Group A. Of the seven patients in Group B, four had mild pain, two had moderate pain, and one had severe pain.

Conclusion: The pencil-point 25-G Whitacre spinal needle has a lower incidence of PDPH than the traditional 25-G Quincke needle and was suggested for patients at risk of PDPH. In light of this, the current study suggested using pencil-point spinal needles for lumbar punctures and spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients.

Key words: Anesthesia; Cutting Spinal Needle; Pencil-Point Spinal Needle; Post-dural Puncture Headache


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Devanand J
Articles by Abunaya H I
Articles by Jiya Michael
Articles by Sheen Tarsis
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

J D, I AH, Michael J, Tarsis S. Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(10): 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024


Web Style

J D, I AH, Michael J, Tarsis S. Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=201422 [Access: October 03, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

J D, I AH, Michael J, Tarsis S. Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(10): 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

J D, I AH, Michael J, Tarsis S. Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024), [cited October 03, 2024]; 14(10): 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



Harvard Style

J, D., I, . A. H., Michael, . J. & Tarsis, . S. (2024) Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 14 (10), 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



Turabian Style

J, Devanand, Abunaya H I, Jiya Michael, and Sheen Tarsis. 2024. Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (10), 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



Chicago Style

J, Devanand, Abunaya H I, Jiya Michael, and Sheen Tarsis. "Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14 (2024), 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

J, Devanand, Abunaya H I, Jiya Michael, and Sheen Tarsis. "Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14.10 (2024), 2130-2134. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

J, D., I, . A. H., Michael, . J. & Tarsis, . S. (2024) Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (10), 2130-2134. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.05210202415062024





Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Assessment of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women Attending the City Tebessa PMI (Algeria) [English]
    Taleb Salima, Kaibi Mounira, Deghboudj Nadjia
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 97-105
    » Abstract

  • Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population
    ShobhaRani Vedala, Niranjan Paul, Abhay B Mane
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 3(2): 118-123
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2013.3.109-114

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • Evaluation of potential drug-drug interaction in indoor patients of pediatric department of tertiary care hospital
    Simran Patel, Mayur Chaudhari, Nrupal Patel
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(10): 1012-1016
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0725209072019

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Analyzing Pharmaceutical Industry [English]
    Veselin Tima Dickov, Dragan Mitrovic, Boris Milan Kuzman
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 1-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2011.1.1-8

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles