E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 10 Apr 2024
 


A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries

Aneesh Rajan, Sheen Tarsis, Mohideen Abdul Kadar S, Abunaya H I.


Abstract
Background: Anesthesia for lower limb surgeries can be administered locally, regionally (spinal or epidural), or generally. The primary option is still spinal anesthesia because of its quick onset, excellent blockage, low infection risk, low failure rate, and affordability. The most widely utilized method is bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. By extending and strengthening the sensory blockade, an adjuvant not only boosts the effectiveness of a local anesthetic but also lowers the dosage of local anesthetic drugs.

Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to assess the synergistic effect and safety of adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine 0.75% in the subarachnoid block for lower limb surgeries compared to fentanyl to ropivacaine 0.75%.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective randomized control study, carried out at the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, for a period of 2 years. Two groups of 30 subjects each were selected for the study by simple random sampling. Patients with physical status ASA 1 or 2 who underwent elective lower limb surgeries were included. Patients in Group F (n = 30) received 3 mL of isobaric 0.75% ropivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl (0.5 mL) and in Group D (n = 30) received 3 mL of isobaric 0.75% ropivacaine with 10 μg dexmedetomidine (0.5 mL). Sensory testing was assessed by loss of pinprick sensation. The motor block in the lower limb was graded according to the modified Bromage scale. Duration of analgesia was noted. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded every 5 min for 1st 30 min and thereafter every 30 min till the patient complained of pain. Results were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 version and the association was tested using Student t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: The average time for sensory block onset was 2.93 ± 0.25 min in Group D and 2.43 ± 1.14 min in Group F. In both Group D and Group F, the length of the sensory block was 281.33 ± 25.15 and 144.67 ± 19.43, respectively, and was extremely significant both statistically and clinically. When compared to Group F, which had analgesia for 144.67 ± 19.43 min, Group D experienced analgesia for a significantly longer duration, 360.67 ± 16.17 min. There was a statistically significant difference (<0.001). In Group D, the average motor block duration was 339.67 ± 19.21 min, whereas in Group F, it was 92.33 ± 16.95 min.

Conclusion: When compared to fentanyl as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, intrathecal dexmedetomidine causes a faster onset of sensory and motor blockade and a longer duration of motor and sensory block, as well as hemodynamic stability, higher sedation, and a longer duration of post-operative analgesia.

Key words: Anesthesia; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Intrathecal; Ropivacaine


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Aneesh Rajan
Articles by Sheen Tarsis
Articles by Mohideen Abdul Kadar S
Articles by Abunaya H I
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Rajan A, Tarsis S, S MAK, I AH. A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(5): 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024


Web Style

Rajan A, Tarsis S, S MAK, I AH. A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=195015 [Access: October 03, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Rajan A, Tarsis S, S MAK, I AH. A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(5): 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Rajan A, Tarsis S, S MAK, I AH. A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024), [cited October 03, 2024]; 14(5): 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



Harvard Style

Rajan, A., Tarsis, . S., S, . M. A. K. & I, . A. H. (2024) A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 14 (5), 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



Turabian Style

Rajan, Aneesh, Sheen Tarsis, Mohideen Abdul Kadar S, and Abunaya H I. 2024. A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (5), 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



Chicago Style

Rajan, Aneesh, Sheen Tarsis, Mohideen Abdul Kadar S, and Abunaya H I. "A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14 (2024), 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Rajan, Aneesh, Sheen Tarsis, Mohideen Abdul Kadar S, and Abunaya H I. "A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14.5 (2024), 985-990. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Rajan, A., Tarsis, . S., S, . M. A. K. & I, . A. H. (2024) A comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in intrathecal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (5), 985-990. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03140202401042024





Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Assessment of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women Attending the City Tebessa PMI (Algeria) [English]
    Taleb Salima, Kaibi Mounira, Deghboudj Nadjia
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 97-105
    » Abstract

  • Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population
    ShobhaRani Vedala, Niranjan Paul, Abhay B Mane
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 3(2): 118-123
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2013.3.109-114

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • Evaluation of potential drug-drug interaction in indoor patients of pediatric department of tertiary care hospital
    Simran Patel, Mayur Chaudhari, Nrupal Patel
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(10): 1012-1016
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0725209072019

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Analyzing Pharmaceutical Industry [English]
    Veselin Tima Dickov, Dragan Mitrovic, Boris Milan Kuzman
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 1-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2011.1.1-8

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles