E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 
2024, Vol: 14, Issue: 4
14 / 4Current Issue Online FirstArchiveAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Downloaded ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
10 / 07 / 2019

 


Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals

Revathi M.


Abstract
Background: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is more objective, reliable, valid method for formative and summative assessment and minimizes subjective bias. The Traditional Practical Examination (TPE) relays on the global competencies and performance of the students. OSPE assesses the shows how aspects in Miller’s pyramid of competence.

Aims and Objectives: This study aims to introduce the OSPE for practical hematology in physiology for the first MBBS students and to analyze the first MBBS student’s perception of OSPE assessment for physiology hematology practical’s.

Materials and Methods: All the first MBBS 150 students of Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Kanchipuram, were included in this study. OSPE was conducted for the students after training them about OSPE. The feedback of the OSPE examination was received from the students from a standard questionnaire.

Results: Fifty-nine students scored high who had >75%, 48 scored between 65% and 75%, 49 students scored between 50% and 65%, and four students were <50%. About 80% of the students felt OSPE improved their learning and helped in identifying the weakness in the skills performed. About 75% of the students perceived that the OSPE examination was unbiased and easy to score and have a better content relevant to the topic.

Conclusion: The students showed positive perception toward OSPE than TPE in hematology practical’s as OSPE was fair, unbiased, and easy to score which was well accepted by the students.

Key words: Objective Structured Practical Examination; Hematology Practical’s; Traditional Practical Examination; Physiology


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Revathi M
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Revathi M. Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(9): 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019

Web Style

Revathi M. Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=54523 [Access: March 15, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Revathi M. Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(9): 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Revathi M. Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2019), [cited March 15, 2024]; 9(9): 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


Harvard Style

Revathi M (2019) Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 9 (9), 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


Turabian Style

Revathi M. 2019. Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 9 (9), 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


Chicago Style

Revathi M. "Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 9 (2019), 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Revathi M. "Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 9.9 (2019), 912-916. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Revathi M (2019) Student’s perception of objective structured practical examination versus traditional practical examinations for hematology physiology practicals. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 9 (9), 912-916. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0623202072019


Author LoginReviewer LoginAbout PublisherEditorial PoliciesEditorial Review PolicyPeer Review PolicyEditorial & Peer Review ProcessPublication Ethics and Publication Malpractice StatementConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyProtection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of ConcernSelf-Archiving PoliciesStatement of Informed ConsentAdvertising PolicyTerms of UseLicense InformationCopyright Information

About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology

  National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is a monthly peer reviewed journal.  The journal is having open access polic ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information


Publisher

publishernjppp@gmail.com

 

Editorial query

editornjppp1@gmail.com

MOB - 8780040272