Service by

Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board About Aims & Scope Editorial Contact


Original Research Open Access


Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis

Rajashekar Y R, Shobha S N.

Abstract
Background: Antiallergic drugs are widely prescribed in allergic rhinitis (AR). Antihistamines and antileukotrienes are effective only in providing symptomatic relief of allergic symptoms, often used as fixed dose combinations (FDC) of both. Controversial reports regarding their efficacy in AR, when used alone or in their combined preparations, prompted the present study.

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the anti-allergic effect of ebastine, montelukast, and their FDC on the subjective nasal and extranasal symptoms in mild-to-moderate persistent AR (PAR) patients.

Materials and Methods: Mild-to-moderate PAR patients divided into three groups to receive drugs ebastine, montelukast, and their combined preparation for 3 weeks. Their efficacy was measured by total five nasal symptoms scoring system, AM, and PM symptom scores. The treatment was withdrawn in the last week, to assess the persisting anti-allergic action of treatment drugs.

Results: When compared to baseline values, all the treatment groups showed a significant decrease in the total mean score of allergic symptoms. Ebastine and its combination with montelukast significantly decreased both AM and PM mean scores, but montelukast did only for PM mean score. Among three compared groups, ebastine and its combined preparation with montelukast were found significant in reducing total and AM symptoms.

Conclusion: All 3 groups showed anti-allergic effects in a variable manner. Montelukast controlled daytime symptoms better. Ebastine and its combination with montelukast controlled allergic symptoms to a similar extent.

Key words: Ebastine; Montelukast; Allergic Rhinitis; Total Five Nasal Symptoms Scoring


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Export to
Export to
Related Records
 Articles by Rajashekar Y R
Articles by Shobha S N
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 118
Downloaded: 56
Cited: 0


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

R RY, N SS. Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017


Web Style

R RY, N SS. Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. http://www.njppp.com/?mno=277934 [Access: January 22, 2018]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

R RY, N SS. Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

R RY, N SS. Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



Harvard Style

R, R. Y. & N, S. S. (2018) Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



Turabian Style

R, Rajashekar Y, and Shobha S N. 2018. Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



Chicago Style

R, Rajashekar Y, and Shobha S N. "Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis." doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

R, Rajashekar Y, and Shobha S N. "Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis." doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

R, R. Y. & N, S. S. (2018) Randomized prospective double-blind comparative clinical study of ebastine and its combined preparation of montelukast in persistent allergic rhinitis. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0935522092017



AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed In

 

National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is Indexed in -

EMBASE

Index Copernicus  (ICV 2016: 109)

Index Medicus for SEAR

CAB abstract/Global Health

CINAHL

Hinari

Google Scholar

ScopeMed

Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory

Indian Science Abstracts

Open J- Gate

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research

NewJour

PSOAR

InformIndia

EBSCO Publishing Electronic Database

Genamics JournalSeek

ProQuest

Index Scholar

SafetyLit

Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)

Gale's Health Reference Center

Gale Info Trac

Gale Academic Onefile

Ind Medica

Scirus

Scientific Publication Index

Scientific Resources Database

Recent Science Index

Scholarly Journals Index

Directory of Academic Resources

Elite Scientific Journals Archives

Current Index to Scholarly Journals

Digital Journals Database

Academic Papers Database

Contemporary Research Index

Ayush Web Portal

CiteFactor

 

 

 

 

 

 

Journal Membership

World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), Dallas, Texas, USA

 

Journal Listed in

ICMJE- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

HIFA 2015 – Healthcare Information for All by 2015, Charlbury, Oxfordshire, UK 

 

 


The articles in this Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.